Cyber sex chat no registration websites
"He definitely did more than just chat," said Chief Justice Christine Durham."He set up a meeting and showed up at the scene." The statute states a person must believe that the person they are chatting with is a minor.
The reason he showed up at the meeting site, was out of curiosity about this person.At issue is whether or not Utah's Internet Enticement statute is unconstitutional by saying a person engaged in sexual speech over the Internet need only believe they are chatting with a minor in order to be convicted. justice system a person is considered innocent until the state can prove their guilt."All you're doing is criminalizing speech," said attorney Ann Taliaferro. Even if a suspect outright confesses to a crime, the state must show independent evidence that they either committed the crime or intended to commit a crime.That's what is prohibited," said Assistant Utah Attorney General Jeffrey Gray.Justice Michael Wilkins asked Gray if it was illegal for someone to have "cyber-sex" with someone claiming to be a minor.According to court documents, Gallegos chatted with the agent on two occasions in 2006.
During those chats, Gallegos expressed that the girl was possibly too young but then went on to suggest how he would like to sexually touch her.
In an attempt to have the charge thrown out, 3rd District Judge Stephen Henroid ruled that it didn't matter that Gallegos showed up at the meeting site and that the crime was completed over the Internet.
During oral arguments Wednesday, justices differed as to whether Gallegos' conversation could convict him.
Although cyber sex may not be the same as 'real' sex, there are still real emotions involved.
You could feel guilty if the person you are having cyber sex with is not your usual partner, and if they find out they might feel very hurt.
Ultimately, the agent and Gallegos arranged a meeting outside a school in Sandy.